Twitter

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

One Last Thing - Richard Sherman

Every Saturday at 4:50 pm, I share "One Last Thing" on Hoffman and Platt. It's an essay on a topic that caught my eye during the week. This week I chose to close a week of conversation on Richard Sherman. Listen to Hoffman and Platt Saturdays at 2 pm on 103.3 FM ESPN.

This week an older man named Jack called into Friedo and Fitzsimmons on the topic of Richard Sherman. "I didn't like what he did with his crazy hair and his crazy eyes" was the gist of his call. I cringed. The underlying racism eats at me. The crazy hair is Richard Sherman's dreads, a hairstyle worn predominantly by black folks and it has nothing to do with who he is.

However when discussing the call with someone later, I brought up the first thing I thought of when Jack described the crazy eyes. It was Marshall Henderson. The volatile shooting guard from Ole Miss whose eyes are crazy by the description of his own coaches. The response - "Yeah, but Henderson's one of the blackest white guys out there."

Which leads me to a simple question - what the hell does that even mean?

Race means the color of your skin. If we talk about Marshall Henderson or even if we go further down the "black white guy scale" to say, Eminem, we're still not talking about someone who would have had to pee in the "colored" restrooms in the 1940's. Not jarring enough? If this was the 1830's, there's no way Eminem could've been enslaved.

We'll never take the next step of having intelligent discussion on race in this country until we disassociate characteristics from skin color. Someone who speaks well is articulate, not white. Someone who listens to hip hop and maybe even can dance with some soul and rhythm isn't black, they just have some rhythm and soul.

When the Texas job was open, there were people who didn't want Charlie Strong to get it because he is black. Not because of any other reason. No personality trait. Not his skill as a football coach. Because he was black. That kind of racism I don't know what you do with because there's no advanced thinking there to be had. Quit being an ignorant tool. That's about all I got. 

But for the other kind. Characteristic racism if you will, it's time to grow up. Say what you mean. Mean what you say. 

If you say you didn't like what Richard Sherman did because barking in a camera about your own greatness isn't how you think someone should act - you prefer a winner with grace - then fine. Say that. Don't call him a thug. He's not a thug. He's loud. He's brash. And while some people will still see that through racial glasses, you've made your point without using race and hopefully meant it. 

Which leads to the final problem. There's got to be a way for the majority, in this case white people, to say something about a minority, black or otherwise, that is critical without the minority playing the race card. I agree with Sherman that some people were being racist cause I saw the tweets that used the N-word and, like Sherman said, some people used thug in replacement of it. You'd have to be beyond naive to think race was an element for some here.

But there were also people who just didn't like what he did and it had nothing to do with race, which is typical in these kinds of things. The racists are always going to come out, but it's not everyone.  If I think a black athlete does something wrong, I shouldn't have to fear being called a racist if I criticize him on nothing to do with race.

It's a group effort. People need to be smarter about what they say. A lot smarter. Quit insinuating racist things and instead say what what you really mean. Then it's up to the "attacked minority" to quit trying to tie them back together. It's a group effort and I'd love it if we could finally start.

Saturday, January 25, 2014

1-25 Hoffman and Platt

Jeff and I are live today at 2 pm CST on 103.3 FM in Dallas and online here. Follow along on twitter @craighoffman and @jeffplatt. We'll also be taking a lot of calls today at 855-787-1033. Here's what we're doing:

2:00 - Mavs: recapping a disappointing roadtrip

2:15 - Josh Brent discussion

2:30 - Trey Wingo, ESPN's NFL Live 

2:45 - Best of 6 Pack

3:00 - Let’s Fix The Mavs: Call us with your reasonable Mavericks solutions at 855-787-1033

3:15 - Do the Cowboys have a new playcaller?

3:30 - Josh Brent: your thoughts at 855-787-1033

3:45 - Does the NBA play too many games? Read Henry Abbot's article we'll discuss here.

4:00 - Cowboys: Recapping a week of perplexing comments at the Senior Bowl

4:15 - Talk To Me: You call. We answer. And that's about it. 855-787-1033

4:30 - More Mavs discussion and our NBA Power Rankings.

4:45 - One Last Thing - How to actually advance the racial discussion in America

We hope you'll join us!

Monday, January 20, 2014

Richard Sherman - Just Shut Up (you, not him)

Note - there have been a few updates to this piece since it was originally posted this morning around 9 am CST. Two have been added as footnotes at the bottom. The other is the video from 'The Dan Patrick Show' in the middle. 

Much of America got introduced to Seahawks cornerback Richard Sherman yesterday for the first time and the reaction was predictably shameful. "Who is this angry, self-centered ego-maniac that's making it all about him?" was about the lightest of the criticism I saw. There was the predictable racial side of the criticism too, but I'm not going there. If you make it about race, you don't deserve my thoughts and nevertheless my (virtual) breath. There's just no hope for you. So I'm not trying.

But to those who were honestly upset about Sherman, I ask why? Is how Sherman acted what I would describe as ideal? No. Is that how I'll teach my kids to act someday? Nah. But do I have a problem with it? Not one iota.  Consider:

1) He's a 25 year old man who just made the biggest play in the biggest play of his life to send his team to the Super Bowl. If that's not enough, he just beat his rival, made the play over a guy who's been talking negatively about him, and that was the most physical game in the NFL this year. He's jacked up on incalculable amounts of testosterone. You're lucky barking at the camera was all he did and FOX is lucky he didn't swear. I thought this tweet from ESPN producer Ande Wall summed it up well:
Exactly.

2) As I tweeted afterwards, there are two sides of Richard Sherman.
To overcome the odds of escaping where he grew up, you've got to have more than a little self-belief. If some of that spills over in the biggest moment of your life, I'll live with it. To call Sherman an idiot or a thug though is just wrong. He is neither and it's not even close. Yes he grew up in Compton. Yes he's got dreads. This is 2014. Are we still really confusing that with a lack of intelligence? I'm not saying there aren't dumb football players but Richard Sherman is the farthest thing from one. The guy graduated 2nd in his high school class and then graduated from Stanford, getting a start on his Master's degree before he left.

In a way, the reaction to Sherman reminds me of the common thoughts on Cowboys star wideout Dez Bryant. People who aren't paying attention see the occasional outburst and display of immaturity and don't have a clue who Dez is. He's a great teammate. So is Sherman. He's thoughtful. So is Sherman. Is there some immaturity? Sure, but if that's what it takes to get that kind of play on the field, I'll happily live with it.

I joined "The Carter Bryant Show" to discuss Sherman, the Super Bowl and more



3) With the exception of the shot at Michael Crabtree, who he called a sorry receiver (he's a very good player), Sherman was right. Richard Sherman is the best corner in the league bar none. Quarterbacks have a league low QBR (quarterback rating) when targeting Sherman. Most cornerbacks are under six feet tall. Sherman is 6'3" with incredible ball skills. Trying to throw a ball over his head in that spot was stupid.

When I pointed this out, I got a lot of "I didn't hear his name all day before that!" which is proving my point, not yours. If a cornerback is doing his job, the receiver he's covering isn't open. That means the quarterback will throw the other way. That means you won't hear the corner's name. Sherman spent a lot of his day covering Vernon Davis. He was targeted only 3 times. I just went back and watched every single one of Colin Kaepernick's completions. You know how many of them were against Richard Sherman? Zero.

They targeted Sherman twice all day. The first was a holding penalty on him and the second was the final play the 49ers ran. There's a reason. He's that damn good. Part of playing professional sports is realizing you're that damn good. Confidence is everything in sports. If a player is confident in what he's doing, he trusts the endless hours of training and studying he's put in and combined with his physical abilities he's going to do his job. Richard Sherman does his job better than anyone else with his job and if he wants to tell us about it after showing it, I'm not gonna smoke him for it.

In the end what bothers me the most is how lazy people are when judging others. I've seen Richard Sherman interviewed enough times to know what he is. He talks a lot. He also backs it up. He's also one of the really thoughtful guys in the NFL. If you saw the two other interviews he did on FOX after the game, you wouldn't think of him the same way as you did in the heat of the moment after with Erin Andrews.

In fact, Michael Strahan told Sherman "I think you scared Erin Andrews in that interview!" as Sherman was on the FOX set and the look on Sherman's face was priceless. He looked mortified and based on that look it wouldn't surprise me at all if he apologized to her the next time he saw her. I don't think he has to (and neither does EA), but it wouldn't surprise me. (Update: Andrews said this morning on The Dan Patrick Show that she wasn't scared at all. She also nails the explanation.)



These are young dudes playing the most physically demanding sport in this country. The goal is to physically manhandle the guy in front of you. Yet in the 30 seconds after the biggest win of a guy's life we expect extreme composure? That's irrational. Instead we got exactly what we should expect - an expression of vindication from a player who's beaten the odds time and again. He made it out of Compton. He's a 5th round pick thanks in part (if you ask Sherman) to his college coach talking him down in the draft. That coach, Jim Harbaugh, was on the other sideline now with the 49ers. The player he beat on the final play also had done his fair share of talking. If there was ever a time to talk, that was it. And he can keep on talking all the way to New York.

UPDATE: Richard Sherman has been writing all season long for "The MMQB," a superbly done all-football website run by SI's Peter King. He wrote this morning. I encourage you to read it - http://mmqb.si.com/2014/01/20/richard-sherman-interview-michael-crabtree/

UPDATE #2: Sherman sent a text to ESPN's Ed Werder apologizing for the one thing he needed to apologize for - taking the attention away from his teammates. As I say at the top of the piece, how Sherman acted wasn't ideal, I just won't kill him for it because I don't think that's warranted based on circumstances. However now that we've seen how it's all played out, I don't see how anyone couldn't give Sherman props for apologizing. He wasn't trying to make everything about him, but it happened. So he apologized for it. Sherman's a smart guy and by all accounts stand-up guy. All he's doing, as cooler heads have prevailed, is proving it again. The high road is always the best long-term option. I just don't get the vitriol towards him given the circumstances.

Saturday, January 18, 2014

1-on-1: Nastia Liukin

Thanks for checking out the first edition of 1-on-1. Eventually this will be housed on KESN1033.com but there's a lot of corporate red tape to cut through so for now, this is your home. I sat down with Olympic champion Nastia Liukin about a month ago and it was, in a word, awesome. In two words, it was welcomely bizarre.

Most people you meet have some sort of wall. With famous people it's normally worse. They're guarded and understandably so. Anyone meets anyone and there's some level of reserve. Not Nastia. It was different in the best of ways. From the moment we shook hands and introduced ourselves in Victory Plaza outside our studios, it felt like two friends who had known each other for years. We talked for about 10-15 minutes and then started taping. Before we did, I asked her how much time we had because I had an inkling from how much I had to ask her and how much we were chatting that we could run a little long. She said "let's just start talking." We did for 55 minutes.


As I hope you'll hear in the interview, she's simply a humble person who's accomplished a lot. She worked hard in her field and made it to the top. But that's oversimplifying it by a lot. There were a few moments where the sweet Texas girl had a fire in her eye matched by any fire in the eye of any athlete in the competitive spectrum from Michael Jordan on down. Gymnastics may be a sport based on grace and performance beauty, but it's still a competition and I don't know how anyone can disagree after listening.

All I ask is that if you like what you hear, pass it on. Whether it's privately to a friend or on whatever social media outlets you use, pass it on. The more support this project gets, the more I'll get to do. I've never been more excited about something because one of the things I love about this industry is getting to tell stories. This is as good an outlet as any to do so.

One of the other things I love is to meet interesting people. With all the things she's done and is doing, Nastia certainly qualifies for that. It's a nice little bonus when you find out these interesting people you've followed professionally are good people personally. Of all the things I'll remember from the first edition of "1-on-1," it'll be that Nastia Liukin more than qualifies for that too.

1-18 Hoffman and Platt

Jeff and I are live today at 2 pm CST on 103.3 FM in Dallas and online here. Follow along on twitter @craighoffman and @jeffplatt. Here's what we're doing:

2:00 - Mavs: Reaction to Phoenix, thoughts from LAC collapse

2:15 - Are Tom Brady's and Peyton Manning's Legacy

2:30 - Eric Edholm, Yahoo! Shutdown Corner

2:45 - Best of 6 Pack

3:00 - Kevin Arnovitz, ESPN.com

3:15 - Making the most of the NFL draft - a look at the NFL's Final Four

3:30 - Discussion of ESPN's "Price of Gold"

3:45 - Would You Rather - NFL Championship Edition

4:00 - Jerry Jones says no to Norv Turner, one of the best stories you'll ever here from Glenn "Stretch" Smith

4:15 - Talk To Me

4:30 - Mavs: mid-season evaluations

4:45 - NFL Picks/One Last Thing (on my interview with Nastia Liukin)

We hope you'll join us!

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

In Memoriam - Ann Hoffman: A full life, full of love

As I type now, it's been exactly a week - about 3 pm last Monday - since my phone rang and my dad, calm as could be, told me his mother had passed. People have asked me all week how I'm doing and I want to take this space to quickly say "thank you." I've got some pretty amazing friends who have kept me occupied and checked in on me throughout the week, and I certainly don't take that for granted. With that said, starting with that phone call from my dad, I've largely been okay and after a weekend with my family I realize why.
That's just who we are. We're an absurd bunch who doesn't like to waste time being sad, mad or upset. Look at me. You think this happened by accident? We like to have fun and my grandmother was certainly the matriarch of the Hoffman clan. I don't know how common a graveside service filled with laughter is, but we had one and we had one because that's what she would have wanted. She just would have wanted it in warmer weather.
This is the fourth time I've sat down to write this week. The first time was immediately following that phone call. It was cathartic. It was emotional. The same words I broke down writing last Monday eventually turned me into an absolute mess Friday as we said goodbye. The second time was Wednesday in preparation for my dad delivering a speech on my behalf at her memorial service in Florida. 
A quick note on that service - there were 250 people there. No more than 20 of them knew her before she moved to Florida. She moved to Florida when she was 70 in 2001. Any questions how my sister became a social butterfly?
The third time I wrote was late Thursday night. It was the speech I gave the next day at her funeral and it came back to the same ending I had when I wrote on Monday. I cried again. I'm giving you fair warning that I'm ending what's below with it as well, and there's a good chance you will too. Friday's speech was a shaping of the thoughts I originally wrote Monday as well as some things that had stuck with me throughout the week. The following is a conglomeration of all three, in memoriam of my grandmother, Ann Hoffman, who lived one hell of a life, defined by love.
----------------------------------------
Writing comes easy to me. "Your paper was a joy to read" was a comment I got on papers throughout my academic career, even if the second part of the phrase was "but you're missing half the information" written next to a giant C. I've written a lot. Meaningful things. Funny things. Entertaining things. Informative things. I can never remember struggling so mightily with writing something as what I would say Friday. How on earth do you sum up what a woman who lived an incredibly full life and was someone you loved dearly in an even moderately concise manner?
This may sound dumb but my biggest struggle was what to actually write about. At this point grandma would tell me "you're not dumb!" Thanks grandma. Although at times I'm pretty sure I qualify.
The more and more I thought about it the more and more I thought the best thing to do is pass along some of the lessons she taught me because they are some of the most important lessons I've learned in my life. When you think about a grandmother teaching her grandson you think of a small child sitting on her lap receiving wisdom straight out of a movie scene. That wasn’t how I learned. It was merely by following her example, even if I didn’t realize I was doing it.
It's really a miracle I got to learn anything from her though. It's a true miracle she made it this long. It's somewhat a miracle I made it this long because I'm pretty sure we almost died simultaneously, not in a car wreck or some tragic accident. No, instead when less than one year old me was sitting atop 6'1" father's shoulders and decided to grab his glasses. Of course his reaction was to grab them too, which meant he was no longer holding me. So I fell. Head first. I'll pause as you all simultaneously say, "that explains a lot." She witnessed the whole thing. She showed a lot of resilience that day not having a heart attack on the spot and since she didn't, not beating her son to a pulp. Guess I know where I get my resilience from. Some non-inherited lessons:
Grandma taught me to learn. She learned something new every day. Sometimes I was lucky enough to teach her. It was often about technology, making the irony of me reading her funeral speech off an iPad incredible because there is a zero percent chance she could use one. In fact I think I showed her mine when she came to Dallas recently and it was the first time instead of "teach me," I heard “oh okay” when she asked what it was. She was always thirsty for knowledge. She wanted to learn, but more importantly she wanted to understand. So many of us float through life without asking why. I can still hear Grandpa saying, “why’d you do dat?!” and Grandma certainly wasn’t afraid to ask why either.
Grandma taught me to experience the world. To the detriment of my bank account, I certainly shared her passion to travel, but going somewhere isn’t enough. You have to experience it. When I’d ask about her trips, it wasn’t merely “we went to Venice.” She’d describe the sites and the sounds and the smells and of course the tastes. That’s how you do it, whether you’re going across the street or across the world. Soak it in. I was so lucky to get to experience some of the world with her and see the joy she took in it.
But most of all, Grandma taught me to love. Every iteration of what I wrote in the past week revolved around one word: love. That’s what she was about. She loved you and was proud of you and let you know to the point where in your head you were going: “Holy crap! I’m not THAT awesome!”
The other thing I kept coming back to was the speech I’ve often gone to more often than anything else for inspiration. Jim Valvano was fighting cancer as he stood at the podium of the 1993 ESPY awards and left not a dry eye in the room. As he wrapped up he spoke of the disease that was ravaging his body and said, “Cancer can take away my physical abilities, but it cannot touch my mind. It cannot touch my heart. It cannot touch my soul.” Jimmy V’s battle was with a horrid disease that ended up taking his life, but the quote applies to so much more. We all have our struggles, but we are in control of what goes on in our minds, our hearts and our souls.
I thought of how this quote applied to my relationship with grandma. Mind. Heart. Soul. Age had certainly begun to take away her physical abilities and quite frankly mentally she wasn't quite as consistently quick as she always was in recent years, but man when she pulled a fastball it still came in at 100 miles per hour. Age certainly had not touched her heart. It still loved like no one I've ever known, but she confided in me more than once that it still ached for grandpa. Forget dying, that love hadn't even diminished. Not one bit. The thought that they could be back together gives me great peace. That leaves her soul which even death cannot touch. Because if we are smart and if we at all care about making the world a better place to live like she did every single day, her soul will live on in all of us. Of that we should always be conscious and for that, we should forever be grateful.
I don’t know if there was a turning point; perhaps I had heard a story somewhere or read one or whatever it was, but I’ve never been afraid to say those three little words: I love you. It’s such a simple thing to me. If you mean it, say it and I make it a point to with those closest to me.
It’s never a throw away, but if you mean it, then why not tell someone and part of the reason why is some irrational fear that if that’s the last time you talk to them, what’s the last thing you would’ve told them? I talked to grandma last weekend and the conversation was our typical catch-up. We talked about what I was up to and how work was going and my upcoming trip to New York. I tried to be really good in our weekly chats about asking what she was up to, but this time we talked about some current events - concussions in football in fact, something she wanted to ask me about (for the record she was very happy I never played!) But I forgot to ask her what she was up to with her insane social calendar, but I sure as hell didn't forget to say “I love you" before we hung up the phone. That was the last thing I said to her. I love you. And now as we say goodbye again for now, that’s really all I wanted to say through all of this thinking and writing all along - Grandma, I'll miss you. Thank you for being exactly who you were. I love you, and I always will.

Saturday, April 13, 2013

Tiger Woods Not DQ'd

Golf is an uptight, self-righteous sport in so many ways. Most sports are played in shorts or pants and a shirt designed to maximize performance. Golf is played in khakis and a polo. Anybody can pick up a basketball and find a hoop. Anybody can get a football or baseball and have a catch with their buddy. Golf is expensive as hell. It's literally a country club sport.

This self-righteous culture is often actually good for the game. I promise I'm trying my best not to be cynical. A young person playing the game can learn valuable lessons about honor and integrity. Self-policing is part of golf and you could very easily sub my "self-righteous" for "responsible." This weekend we've seen both the worst this responsible/self-righteous culture can show in a penalty on a teenager and at the same time that the game is progressing in the ruling with Tiger Woods.

For those that don't know - Tiger's approach shot on the 15th hole Friday hit the flag stick and careened into the water. He then took a drop just behind his original shot. The rules are dense but what you need to know is that for the drop option Tiger chose, you're supposed to drop as close to the original spot as possible. Tiger admitted in his post-round interview that he dropped about two yards back for a better distance. This isn't directly why Tiger wound up almost getting DQ'd and did receive a two stoke penalty.

Because he took an illegal drop, Woods should have assessed himself a penalty. Because he didn't, he then had an incorrect scorecard and signing an incorrect scorecard is grounds for disqualification. In 2012, there was a new rule added that if someone calls in a rules violation they see on television that a player was unaware of that caused an incorrect scorecard, the player is assessed a two stroke penalty and not DQ'd. This was applied to Tiger and this is where things get messy.

First and foremost, the fact that some buffoon at home can call in a rules violation is a joke. Could you imagine in other sports if this was the case? You think those calls in the Syracuse/Michigan game would've stood up? Hell no! My tail would've been on the phone screaming bloody murder about the block/charge call and how the officials screwed it up. But this is golf! The sport so obsessed with the rules that a gentleman's agreement to enforce them to the best of his knowledge just isn't good enough. You need Harry at home with his rulebook and likely his rotary phone.

When you get down to it though, the decision is controversial and I fully understand that. The rule was put in place because HD has made it possible to see violations that we didn't know previously existed such as blades of grass moving. Again, the fact that this constitutes some violation is absurd, but roll with me. The spirit of the TV rule that permits a temporarily incorrect scorecard wasn't put in place for a player who was ignorant of the rules like Woods apparently was here. So how does the Masters justify it? Perfectly.

The rules officials got a call from some schmuck and looked at Tiger's drop while he was still on the course. They ruled the drop was good enough and that no penalty should have been assessed. It wasn't until Tiger's post-round interview where he said he dropped it purposely two yards back that they re-visited the drop and determined that something was amiss. So, in other words: it took television for them to realize there had been a violation. It wasn't a replay like the rule had been designed for, but an interview that doesn't happen if not for TV.

Is it a stretch? Maybe. But it feels right to me. The rules of golf are horribly confusing and if an official on the course and officials in the clubhouse didn't determine that he had broken a rule until he admitted it after the round than can you blame Woods for being a little confused? And for those screaming that Woods should withdraw: get over yourselves. "It's the right thing to do!" Nick Faldo went as far as to say it's the "manly" thing to do.

1) Have you seen the pants some of these dudes wear? "Manly" isn't exactly the adjective that first jumps to mind when I think about golf. Good work Faldo.

2) Do you really think one of the fiercest competitors in the history of earth who also has an incredible respect for the game and it's history would blatantly admit to and brag about violating the rules and getting away with it?! Hell. To. The. No.

Is ignorance an excuse? In this case yes. The rules of golf are comparable to the rules of the NCAA. They're way too dense for any human to memorize and while this seems pretty simple, remember Woods had three choices of what to do on a drop. He mixed up two of them. Big deal. What's the penalty? Strokes? Yes. Disqualification? No. That would have been for signing the incorrect scorecard. So in the end you wind up just tacking on the penalty and Woods plays on. Sounds like a logical conclusion to me and good on the USGA for doing just that.